Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'94 BMC 39K
06-18-2008, 05:28
Post: #5
'94 BMC 39K
John,

weight seems to be 31,000lbs compared to an '87 FC35 at 34,000lbs,
looks to me like with similar power (300hp) the BMC has a slight weight
advantage and an extra gear, they could be correct on the performance
claim.

Steve
Wannabee

----- Original Message -----
From: "bubblerboy64"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:16 AM
Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: '94 BMC 39K


>I wonder how that bus would perform. I am not in the market (but who
> knows down the road) there are things I like about the BMC's but I
> noticed a couple things which I would want to consider. Power being
> one. That coach is about 7 tons heavier and 100 hp more the "The
> Napper" and one of the reasons to even consider moving up would be to
> be able to climb hills a little better. The comment was made about it
> climbing hills with ease or something similar. My thoughts are I
> might not be all that much better off. Boy, if I would move I would
> only want to do it once and for a BIG improvement. So, although this
> is a good price I am not certain that there are as many pluses as I
> would need to move. So how do these 300 hp cummins run down the road
> for you guys who have had more then one BB?
> John Heckman
> central Pa
> 1973 FC
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
'94 BMC 39K - Steve Pfiffner - 06-18-2008, 00:09
'94 BMC 39K - bubblerboy64 - 06-18-2008, 00:35
'94 BMC 39K - Don Bradner - 06-18-2008, 03:32
'94 BMC 39K - bubblerboy64 - 06-18-2008, 04:16
'94 BMC 39K - Steve Pfiffner - 06-18-2008 05:28



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)